Coral reefs are the most diverse and complex marine ecosystem and comprise the largest biological structure on the earth. For most people, they are a place of vibrant colors, high biodiversity and full of life. Recently, however, coral reefs have been facing increasing hazards and threats and many coral habitats worldwide have been declining rapidly.
Coral bleaching is one of the worst problems for ocean biodiversity and climate. The ever-increasing level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere causes rising temperatures, which in turn causes ocean acidification, impacting both fishes and coral reefs across the globe. As the human population of the Earth continues to grow and the effects of climate change become more prevalent, it would be expected to witness even worse conditions for coral reefs, fishes and in turn humans. Declines in fish population and coral diversity will have an effect on all living things and is a course for disaster.
The UN's 13th goal of Sustainable Development of below 2 degrees increase in temperature in the next 50 years will be impossible to withold unless something drastic is done in the next three years!
This article will showcase the problem at hand and the correlations between human made climate change, with a perspective to tourism and overfishing to understand how the coral reefs suffer and what is to be expected in the coming years.
Most reef-forming corals contain symbiotic microscopic algae (zooxanthellae), which under usual conditions provide up to 90% of the energy requirement of corals. Certain environmental conditions, however, may provoke stress to the corals, and their stress response results in these algae being expelled from the coral host. Zooxanthellae contain colorful pigments, and their departure reveals the coral's white underlying calcium carbonate skeleton through the translucent tissue - the coral appears “bleached”. The images below are of a normal coral (left) and a bleached coral (right), showing the drastic change in appearance caused by coral stess.

Environmental stressors including low salinity, unusually cold temperature and increased exposure to light can result in localized coral bleaching. However, mass coral bleaching events have been linked to warm oceanic temperature anomalies, which occur on the scale of hundreds to thousands of kilometers, when ambient water temperatures exceed the coral's tolerance level. Such bleaching has an impact on the animal habitats as the symbiotic system is made vulnerable and in some cases destroyed.
Datasets have been gathered from the NOAA, National Oceanic and Atmosphere Administration, which runs several services useful for our investigation. One of them -Coral Reef Watch- provides information on sea surface temperature. Comparison of these temperatures with long-term monthly climatology enables emitting of bleaching alerts for coral reefs at their locations. Another dataset -Simple Ocean Data Assimilation (SODA)- aims to reconstruct the physical and biogeochemical history of the ocean, and has data of ph-level, co2 etc. on a global scale. From these datasets we have analysed the years from 1986 all the way up to 2020, as those are the years were the data is complete.
This article lets you explore the general tendencies and correlation, while zooming into specific coral reef locations to showcase the problem at hand. In the map below, you can see the stations where temperature readings has been gathered from. Feel free to explore the map by zooming in and taking a closer look.
To start with, an overview of the trends of climate measurements and bleaching alerts from 1986 to 2020 has been constructed.
The Figure below shows the amount of yearly bleaching alerts through the years. The levels are as follows:
It is known that major bleaching events occurred in 1998 and 2017, where temperatures also reached an abnormal level. In fact 1998 was a temperature record year in the 20th century. Sea surface temperature is the exact measure used to classify bleaching alerts, and so it is not a coincidence that higher temperature means more severe bleaching alerts.
In the Figure above, bleaching alert level 0 has been omitted, displaying only levels 1 through 4.
The global general trend of bleaching alerts shows that, as alerts from higher levels become more prevalent, severe bleaching is becoming more and more regular with the passage of time. Here the years examined above are clearly frequented by bleaching; not only level 4 alerts are significantly higher, but also levels 3 and 2.
The following Figure shows the tendencies of temperature and CO2, which follows the often described course of climate change. It is also shown how alkalinity and pH-level develops over time on a global scale. In the Figure you can explore both the yearly and monthly trends by clicking the tabs.
The emission of CO2 is already attributed to climate change and rise in temperature and thereby sealevel rise. But another grueling aspect of higher concentration of carbon dioxid in the atmosphere is the release of more free hydrogen ions into the water making it acidic thus contributing even more to coral bleaching and general crisis in animal and coral life.
Alkalinity works as a buffer for this acidification and the production of bicarbonate and the calcification of corals.
Looking at the yearly average of these measurements, it is clear that temperature, CO2 and pH has a tendency as described above. Especially CO2 and pH have very similar curves and seem to be negatively correlated. This is not so clear for alkalinity, which seems to be a little bit lower in recent years.
The seasonal trends are also shown in the Figure within the monthly tab, here it is noticeable that there is a higher concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere when it is summer in the southern hemisphere of the world. This could be attributed to fact that there is less landmass resulting in increased amount of data from these regions, which in turn skewes the monthly averages. Another explanation could be that the areas with more landmass and thus more trees could to a higher extent convert CO2 to oxygen in the spring when most trees grow their leafs. There is also peaks in temperature in the summer months of both hemispheres.
The pH level and CO2 concentration peak oppositely; months with higher values of CO2 are months where the pH level is lower, i.e. more acidic. The reason for this suspecious relation is that CO2 concentration measured is used to calculate the pH-levels.
The most noticeable is the very steep drop in alkalinity in the months July, September and August, perhaps attributed to the lower CO2 concentration in the atmosphere in these months. Here there is a much clearer trend than was seen in the yearly trends and visualizes the more seasonal dependency of these variables.
The carbon cycle is a very delicate system and it is very difficult to say how everything effects coral bleaching and health in general, although there seems to be a clear tendency between the emission of fossil fuels and the increase in temperature and acidification.
Take a look at the following heatmaps, where the years of major bleaching alerts have been included; namely 1998 and 2017. As a contrast the year 2001 is included to show the amount of level 4 bleaching in a "normal" year. The heatmaps depict the amount of level 4 bleaching alerts throughout the corresponding year.
It is clearly seen based on these heatmaps that coral reefs are located around the equator, meaning higher temperatures are to be expected.
It is also noticeable that the amount of alerts are much higher in 2017; where there seems to be much more frequent bleaching all around the globe, with the exception of the middle east. The reefs off the coast of Australia and South east Asia seems to be extremely effected by higher temperatures and in turn increased coral bleaching. Remember level 4 alerts are classified as severe bleaching, so it would be expected that the coral reefs are at a high risk of mortality in these areas.
For the year 2001 the lower amount of level 4 bleaching compared to 1998 and 2017 doesnt mean that there arent still bleaching that occurs, it is just not as widespread and serious. To understand how the bleaching alerts develop, it can be shown how frequent the different alerts are through the period and it is also interesting to understand the development in recent times.
So far we have gotten a sense of the very severe development of climate change and thus coral bleaching, but to get a better idea of relations between bleaching and climate, the following will be a more in-depth examination of the correaltions between the different variables.
How are the climate variables connected? To answer this question, one must first look at the correlation plots to analyse how the average variables temperature (avg_temp), CO2 (avg_co2), pH (avg_ph) and total alkalinity (avg_talk) are linked. The correlation plots below show how some of the variables are positively or negatively connected.
It is clearly seen in the Figure above that temperature, CO2 and pH are correlated. The strongest correlation is seen between pH and CO2, where an increase in CO2 causes a decrease in pH, hence a strong negative correlation. The CO2 from the atmosphere is dissolved in the seawater, thereby decreasing the pH. The increase in atmospheric CO2 over time will therefore be linked to a corresponding decrease in pH. For the dataset used to contruct these visualizations, the pH variable is actually calculated directly from the measured CO2. The reason the two variables are not completely correlated, might be due to rounding of the calculated pH.
The average temperature and CO2 are also correlated, showing increasing temperature relating to increasing CO2.
With global warming, it seems that the increasing temperature and CO2 will almost certainly decrease the pH levels of the water. The negative effects of the ocean acidification is not only limited to the corals, but affects these directly by removing carbonate, which is a calcifying agent needed to build and maintain the skeleton of the corals. It seems as though something has to change if the corals should have a fair chance of surviving the global warming.
The most interesting correlation here is the average temperature and average CO2 as these are from measured values. There seems to be a strong correlation between these as would be expected from a climate change perspective.
The rest of the correlations reveal what has already been discussed; namely that pH is calculated from CO2, Which is why the correlation is almost perfect and this is also why the correlation in the Figures CO2 vs. Alkalinity and pH vs. Alkalinity are symmetric.
It would seem that some of these visualisations are not useful, but the information gained is that it can be difficult to find causality between variables. It is not trivielle that pH is not a measured value, but finding this can be important for latter conclusions. And so exhaustive examinination is necessary for a clear analysis and to understand the dynamics of the oceans and coral reefs.
From the previous Figures it was seen that the average yearly temperature increases over time, but is this really the case everywhere on the globe? To help better understand the change in temperature over time the Figure below depicts the temperature as a function of latitude (lat), with latitude ranging from 90 at the north pole to -90 at the south pole, making 0 the location of the equator. In the first plot the yearly maximum (max), mean and minimum (min) are calculated at all measured latitudes, and show the range of temperatures at all latitudes.
In order to depict the general change in temperature over the years the temperature and latitude data of each selected range of years was fitted to a second order polynomial. The difference in temperature are small relative to the normal range of temperature, meaning the difference between the ranges of years might be of more interest. The difference in temperature is calculated as the fitted curve for the range of years minus the fitted curve for year [1982-1990].
The yearly max, mean and min temperature show that the general temperature range is around 10 degrees at most lattitudes. As expected higher temperatures are seen around the equator, lowering towards the north and south pole. A quite small range of temperature can be seen at latitudes of 0 to 10, where it only changes around 7 degrees. The water temperaure in these areas can therefore be expected to be both higher and more constant than other regions of the globe.
The temperature differences for the fitted curves show an overall steady increase in temperature over time, but also that the overall increase in temperature is not equal across the globe. The increase in temperature is much lower towards the poles and is highest around the equator (lat = 0) and further north to latitudes of around 40.
The Great Barrier Reef has a latitude of around -16.4, meaning it is well within the range of latitudes that have seen a yearly increase in temperature of roughly 0.2 degrees celcius between the last two decades. If nothing is done to prevent it, the pattern would suggest that these areas would see further increase in temperature in the next decades.
In order to investigate the connection between temperature, latitude and bleaching alerts further, the Figure below cen be examined. Here the first graph shows the max, mean and min yearly temperature as a function of latitude as seen previously. On this first graph is plotted all bleaching alerts of level 1-4 as a function of the corresponding temperature and latitude of the individual bleaching alerts. The plot is interactive such that individual bleaching alert levels can be hidden.